Dune: Part Two – Ending Explained

The culmination of Dune 2 marks a pivotal juncture in Paul Atreides’ saga, offering a gripping close to the current narrative while laying the groundwork for what lies ahead in the storied science fiction universe.


The tale of Paul Atreides concludes with a potent mix of inevitable authority and calamity, hinting at an impending Holy War by the end of Dune: Part Two. A surprising turn from Chani coupled with Paul’s rise to power paves the way for Dune 3, potentially setting the stage for an adaptation of Dune: Messiah. The core message of Dune 2 revolves around the perilous nature of power, with Paul’s ascent to dominance culminating in a bitter and tumultuous finale. Note: This section contains spoilers for Dune: Part Two.

Denis Villeneuve’s adaptation of Frank Herbert’s seminal work reaches an exhilarating climax in Dune: Part Two, setting the stage for the franchise to flourish further. Following the events of Dune 2021, we witness Paul Atreides’ (Timothée Chalamet) integration into Fremen society and his struggle with the prophecy of Lisan al Gaib. The narrative is deeply invested in the evolving dynamics between Paul and Chani (Zendaya) as they rally against House Harkonnen to decide the fate of Arrakis. Complications arise as Lady Jessica (Rebecca Ferguson) perpetuates the belief in her son as the messiah of the Fremen.

As Dune 2 reaches its zenith, the focus shifts to Paul’s daunting challenge to ascend as the new Emperor. This ambition leads to an all-out assault on the Harkonnens, climaxing with Paul’s assassination of Baron Vladimir Harkonnen (Stellan Skarsgård) and a pivotal confrontation with his nephew, Feyd-Rautha Harkonnen (Austin Butler), for dominion. The events unfold in alignment with Paul’s most dreaded premonitions, casting a tragic shadow over the conclusion of Dune 2 and setting the narrative trajectory for a potential third installment inspired by Dune: Messiah.

Paul’s Awakening and the Salvation of Arrakis

Paul’s Ascension as the Lisan Al Gaib

In the sequel to Denis Villeneuve’s 2021 adaptation, Dune: Part Two explores Paul Atreides’ relentless quest for vengeance against those responsible for his family’s downfall. Gifted with prophetic insights, Atreides is caught in a dilemma between his profound love and the destiny of the cosmos.

At the heart of Dune 2’s finale lies Paul Atreides’ acceptance of his destiny as the Lisan al Gaib, Arrakis’ savior, and a unifying Emperor over the cosmos. Chalamet’s portrayal of Paul depicts his internal conflict with the foreseen carnage his leadership could unleash. Despite his reluctance, Paul aims to demonstrate his worth to the Fremen and aid in their liberation, a task complicated by Stilgar’s (Javier Bardem) unwavering belief in him and Jessica’s propagation of the messianic prophecy among the Fremen.

Battling against the inevitability of his destiny, Paul is eventually coerced southward to consume the Water of Life and embrace his role as the Lisan al Gaib, following the destruction of the Fremen’s northern seitch by Feyd-Rautha. Paul’s strategy involves mastering the extensive powers of the Bene Gesserit through the Water of Life, setting the stage for the unfolding drama and his eventual rise to power.

Paul Atreides’ journey towards unparalleled dominion on Arrakis and beyond reaches a climax as he harnesses the collective might of the Fremen population, securing their unwavering support through a miraculous feat. This alliance not only solidifies his command over Arrakis but also empowers the Fremen’s elite Fedaykin army, alongside the nuclear arsenal of House Atreides, to decisively overpower the Harkonnens.

Leveraging this newfound power, Paul confronts Emperor Shaddam IV (Christopher Walken), challenging his reign by revealing his survival and drawing him into a confrontation on Arrakis. Paul’s strategy to dethrone the Emperor unfolds in two critical steps. Initially, he proposes marriage to Princess Irulan (Florence Pugh), ensuring that the Corrino lineage maintains its influence. Following this, he faces Feyd-Rautha in combat, acting as Shaddam’s champion. The defeat of Feyd-Rautha not only terminates the Harkonnen lineage’s immediate claim to power but also creates a direct route for Paul to assume the throne, irrespective of the Great Houses’ acceptance.

Through these calculated maneuvers, Paul not only frees Arrakis from the clutches of Harkonnen tyranny but also positions House Atreides and himself at the zenith of power. As the recognized leader of House Atreides, the Fremen’s messiah as the Lisan al Gaib, and the Emperor of the known universe, Paul attains the ultimate vision he foresaw in Dune 2—ruling with the support of a religious jihad and acknowledging the grim outcome of a galactic conflict that would result in countless deaths.

While Dune has seen adaptations in 1984 and 2000, neither venture fully explored Frank Herbert’s extensive novel series, leaving the intricate web of political and religious warfare largely uncharted on screen.

The Inception of Holy War Against the Great Houses

The closing scenes of Dune 2 underscore a critical moment as Lady Jessica announces the beginning of a “Holy War,” marking a new era of conflict as Paul’s forces prepare to engage the Great Houses. Following the refusal of the Great Houses to recognize Paul’s elevation to Emperor, he, along with Stilgar, Gurney (Josh Brolin), and others, spearheads a campaign to assert his dominance across the galaxy. This initiative not only seeks to consolidate Paul’s rule but also to command respect and honor for his leadership.

The known Great Houses of the Dune universe play pivotal roles in this unfolding saga, including House Atreides, House Corrino, and others, each with its own stake in the galaxy’s intricate power dynamics.

The Holy War that ensues is a manifestation of Paul’s prophetic visions from the 2021 film, where he foresaw a relentless crusade spreading through the cosmos. Driven by the Fremen’s unwavering belief in Paul as their Lisan al Gaib, this religious jihad embarks on a ruthless mission to validate their messiah’s sovereignty, a campaign that inevitably leads to the loss of billions of lives either in resistance to Paul’s rule or in defiance of the Fremen’s creed.

While Dune 2 lays the groundwork for this monumental conflict, the narrative hints that the conquest of the universe will not be the central focus of a potential third installment, setting the stage for further exploration of the consequences and complexities of this universal crusade.

As Dune 2 draws to a close, it offers a glimpse into the initial stages of Paul Atreides’ reign, diverging from Dune: Messiah, which portrays him as a seasoned emperor. This narrative decision serves to highlight the origins of Paul’s governance, setting the stage for future developments in the saga.

The Departure of Chani: A Shift from the Original Narrative

One of the most unexpected turns in Dune 2 is the alteration of Chani’s storyline from the original novel by Denis Villeneuve. Throughout the film, Chani harbors doubts about the Lisan al Gaib prophecy, despite her growing affection for Paul. In a significant deviation from the book, Chani chooses to leave Paul after he ascends to the throne and marries Princess Irulan, despite his assurances of undying love for her. This departure is seen as a betrayal by Chani and conflicts with her desires, prompting her to leave.

Chani’s exit at the end of Dune 2 finds her preparing to mount a sandworm, leaving her future uncertain. This change by Villeneuve leaves open the question of her ultimate destination, suggesting she might seek independence from Paul’s influence, aligning with her Fremen heritage. This narrative choice opens up new possibilities for the storyline in a potential adaptation of Dune: Messiah, with Chani’s fate left ambiguous.

Paul Atreides: The Tragic Antagonist

Denis Villeneuve’s Dune 2 emphasizes the inevitability of Paul’s transformation into the Lisan al Gaib, portraying it as a tragic descent into villainy. Despite his initial resistance to the prophecy and his reluctance to become the Fremen’s savior, Paul is depicted as struggling against an inescapable destiny that propels him towards becoming a messianic figure, leading to war.

This portrayal underscores the tragedy of Paul’s acceptance of his role as Lisan al Gaib, as he is compelled to engage in actions he detests to protect Arrakis. The film conveys this through the lens of Paul and Chani’s relationship, highlighting his attempts to reconcile his love for her with the harsh realities of his responsibilities. Chani’s eventual departure underscores the personal sacrifices Paul faces, adding depth to his character arc and emphasizing the complexities of his position.

Adaptational Differences in Dune 2

While Dune 2 remains largely faithful to the latter half of Frank Herbert’s original novel, the film introduces notable changes under Villeneuve’s direction. Among these is the depiction of Paul and Feyd-Rautha’s confrontation, maintaining the essence of the source material while adapting it for a contemporary audience. These modifications not only update the story for a new generation but also provide fresh perspectives on the characters and their motivations, allowing for a nuanced exploration of the themes of power, destiny, and sacrifice.

The Evolution of Chani’s Role and Other Key Changes in Dune 2

In its cinematic iteration, Dune 2 diverges notably from Frank Herbert’s original narrative, particularly in its portrayal of Chani and other central characters. Unlike in the book, where Chani remains steadfastly by Paul’s side, accepting her position as his true love amidst his political marriage to Irulan, the film opts for a more dramatic arc with Chani choosing to leave Paul post his ascension and marriage to Irulan. This departure marks a significant shift, highlighting a thematic exploration of love, loyalty, and personal autonomy against the backdrop of political and social upheaval.

Additionally, Dune 2 introduces alterations in character roles and fates, notably in the handling of Alia Atreides and the absence of Thufir Hawat, as well as changes in the pivotal confrontation between Paul and Feyd-Rautha. The decision to exclude Alia Atreides (Anya Taylor-Joy) from the narrative that leads to Baron Harkonnen’s demise, entrusting Paul with the act instead, alongside the omission of Thufir Hawat and the alteration of Feyd-Rautha’s assassination attempt, underscores a conscious choice to streamline the story for cinematic purposes.

Anticipating Dune 3: A Glimpse into the Future

With the conclusion of Dune 2, the stage is set for a potential adaptation of Dune: Messiah, as teased throughout the sequel. Dune: Messiah, set twelve years after the events of Herbert’s first novel, sees Paul Atreides firmly established as the Emperor. The hinted “holy war” not only serves as a narrative bridge to the third film but also as a catalyst for political machinations among the Great Houses, aiming to dethrone Paul.

Although an official announcement for Dune 3 remains forthcoming, Denis Villeneuve has hinted at ongoing development. The sequel is anticipated to delve deeper into the complexities of Paul’s political marriage to Irulan, juxtaposed against his enduring love for Chani, a dynamic further complicated by Chani’s ambiguous fate in Dune 2. This intricate love triangle, integral to the narrative of Dune: Messiah, promises to explore the characters’ relationships with renewed depth and nuance.

The casting of Anya Taylor-Joy as Alia Atreides, Paul’s younger sister, is another significant preparatory step for the next chapter. Alia’s envisioned role in Dune 3 is set against a backdrop of profound change, with her presence in a vision of a transformed Arrakis hinting at the evolving landscape of the story.

The Underlying Message of Dune 2’s Climax

Beneath the surface of its epic narrative and stunning visuals, Dune 2 encapsulates a cautionary tale about the intoxicating allure of power. Through Paul’s journey to supremacy, the film explores the dual nature of liberation and subjugation, reflecting on the consequences of charismatic leadership and fervent belief. The ending, which sees Paul liberating one faction while inadvertently oppressing others, serves as a poignant commentary on the inherent paradoxes of power and the cyclical nature of conflict and conquest. This thematic depth ensures that Dune 2 transcends its genre boundaries, offering a reflective examination of the human condition and the complexities of leadership and legacy.

This article may contain affiliate links, which means we may earn a commission if you purchase through these links.